The Nonprofit Development Companion – “Development” And “Fundraising” Are NOT Interchangeable [Book Review]
Jul 25, 2011 Weblog
The Nonprofit Development Companion: A Workbook for Fundraising Success (The AFP/Wiley Fund Development Series) has a wealth of information which I have recently found helpful in crafting a fundraising plan in light of the all encompassing development plan. This is because this book clearly delineates the differences between “development” and “fundraising.”
While attending a recent Association of Fundraising Professionals chapter meeting, Karla Williams challenged the audience on their title within their respective organizations. By a show of hands it was amazing how many fundraisers held the title of “development officer.” To an outsider, or newcomer to the nonprofit sector, these terms are used interchangeably. However, doing so is a disservice to nonprofit professionals and the sector as a whole. I recommend purchasing this book as an adjunct to the seminal work on fundraising, Achieving Excellence in Fundraising (Wiley Desktop Editions), because it completes the context of fundraising within the wider construct of development.
Tags: book review, communication, integrated development plan, management, misconceptions, professional development, strategic planning
Questioning Diversity in Fundraising
Jun 21, 2011 Weblog
I’m currently on vacation so, the past couple days, I’ve been working my way through Cultivating Diversity in Fundraising by Janice Gow Pettey. As I read her book, several questions keep coming to mind. Anybody that really knows me will appreciate that I tend to ask a lot of questions to challenge my own assumptions. This isn’t to say I disagree with my assumptions, rather I think it’s important to be on a continual quest for knowledge and questioning is one of the ways I learn best. With that said…
One of the underlying themes of Janice’s book is that, by bring diversity to fundraising we will improve donor experience, fundraiser performance, and organizational sustainability.
If this is true, then:
- Why don’t I see more AFP or CASE conferences, seminars, or webinars discussing best practices of incorporating diversity into a nonprofit’s organizational culture?
- Why don’t leading charity evaluation tools (e.g. GiveWell or GuideStar) have measures for diversity as it applies to organizational performance, donor experience, or sustainability?
- Are we demonstrating an ethical dilemma by not seriously considering diversity in our organizational strategic plans?
Tags: AFP/Wiley Fund Development Series, culture, diversity, donor experience, ethics, fundraising, performance measures, strategic planning, sustainable
How to Build a Philanthropic Plan
May 2, 2010 Weblog
Over the past several months I have been participating in the mentoring program with my local chapter of AFP. The majority of the meetings with my mentee have focused on helping her articulate a case for support and building a philanthropic plan for the organization’s integrated strategic plan.
To extend the value of the work done with my mentee to others looking to improve their strategic planning skills, we will spend the next several weeks breaking down the parts of a philanthropic plan. The philanthropic plan typically consists of five basic parts. These parts build on one another as your plan progresses to give your strategy clarity. The early sections give detail so that the latter sections can concentrate on providing a concise road-map of actionable items to achieve your development goals.
As with grammar, these parts are listed below to simply to provide structure and a general guideline, but rules are made to be broken (provided you understand the rules and the reason for them). These parts include:
- Organizational Context – mission, vision, history, values
- Philanthropic Environment – fundraising resource audit, SWOT analysis
- Philanthropic Goals – strategic, financial, timetable
- Philanthropic Strategy – cases for support (audience, case, and implementation)
- Benchmarks – staff performance metrics, strategic, financial
Next: Organizational Context
Tags: best practice, case for support, defining terms, fundraising, history, integrated development plan, interest, linkage, management, mission, philanthropic plan, philanthropy, resource audit, strategic planning, SWOT, values, vision
How Long Will It Take You to Raise the Money?
Nov 17, 2009 Weblog
All too often well intentioned staff or board members will come to you, the seasoned fundraising professional asking for help securing funds for a need not originally in the strategic plan and more specifically, the integrated development plan.
These requests are usually for last minute programs, non-budgeted expenses, “silver bullet” fundraising events, and my personal favorite consultant fees… upfront payment for somebody promising to write grant requests.
When these requests come across my desk I’ll typically ask these questions:
Is the (insert urgent need here) worth alienating the donor most likely to fund the request? Not usually. If you have been properly cultivating and stewarding your donors you might have somebody interested in helping with urgent needs. If this is true, be sure to link the funding need to your mission and provide a clear case for support that resonates with your donor’s personal interests.
Why wasn’t this in our original budget? Usually last minute financial needs are not considered in the original budget because they are not essential to your ability to satisfy the organizational mission. If the emerging need is critical for organizational success, ask yourself (and the board) “what can we cut from the planned budget to fund this unplanned item?”
If we pay upfront for somebody to write grant requests, how do we keep them accountable for meeting performance benchmarks? You can’t. Staff performance should be built into the strategic plan and should be reviewed by the board at least quarterly. Adding staff or consultants to the payroll without clear performance expectations, and which are paid irrespective of performance sends a terrible message to the remainder of the organizational staff being held accountable by the strategic plan and proper board governance.
So when I’m asked “how long will it take you to raise the money?” I typically respond that it will take anywhere between four months and a year. This range varies depending on how the specific item relates to organizational mission, strategic plan, integrated development plan, budget priorities, board oversight, and donor linkage, ability and interest.
Tags: ability, best practice, budget, funding priorities, governance, grants, integrated development plan, interest, linkage, misconceptions, mission, pitfalls, staff performance, strategic plan, strategic planning